NEET ordinance gets its first challenge in court
The ordinance that deferred by a
year the Supreme Court order to conduct the National Eligibility Entrance Test
(NEET) from 2016 is back in court.
Health activist Anand Rai, known for exposing the Vyapam scam—an
admission and recruitment scandal in Madhya Pradesh—on Thursday filed a
petition in the Supreme Court against the centre’s decision to promulgate the
ordinance.
The petition that sought the quashing of the ordinance questioned
the centre’s flip-flop on the issue. The centre had initially accepted the apex
court’s order and later partially reversed it through the ordinance.
The centre’s decision was in violation of Section 14 (right to
equality), Section 21 (right to life) in terms of its arbitrary character and
with regards to the students who would suffer irreparably because of the
constantly changing stand by the centre, the petition stated.
The petitioner said various associations across the country have
to be treated with equality under law and administrative authority should be
exercised to assure a degree of fair decision-making. The centre had given an
undertaking and fulfilled criteria for a unified NEET, and yet within four
weeks, it passed the ordinance, the petition said, calling the ordinance
“arbitrary”.
“This would go on to show mala fide and ill intent towards the
admission of students who will ultimately suffer because of this see-saw
approach by the centre,” the petition stated.
Rai also pointed to corruption in state entrance exams as a major
reason to question the centre’s stand. “NEET should be implemented for all
medical colleges from this year itself. State medical examinations are a source
of immense corruption, which is evident from the Vyapam scam,” said Rai.
He said that the state entrance tests are usually rigged and are
often conducted again. “We need one standard entrance and ensure that it is
conducted free and fair,” Rai added.
On states’ concerns over the lack of provision for taking the test
in regional languages in NEET, Rai said that medical education is essentially
imparted in the English language.
“The Medical Council of India, which regulates medical education,
says that a first division in English is compulsory for MBBS. Also, when states
do not have issues with engineering or law entrance examinations, then why on
the medical entrance?” asked Rai.
Legal experts, however, say that the centre is within its rights
to exempt states from NEET for one year. “NEET was scheduled to be held under a
central Act, which was upheld by the court holding that it should be
implemented this year itself. Personally, I think that if the centre, through
an ordinance, wishes to hold the exam after a year, it is within their rights.
The centre can take a stand on whether it wants to hold the exam this year or
after a year; such a decision is within their realm,” said senior advocate
Jayant Bhushan.
Students, though, want clarity on the issue at the earliest.
“The most important thing now is to know whether it is only NEET
or not. Performance of many students has suffered because of the lack of
clarity,” said Ameya Suri, a student from Mumbai who appeared for NEET that was
conducted on 1 May.
Meanwhile, Sankalp Charitable Trust, on whose public interest
litigation the apex court passed the order, also said that it is preparing to
file a petition challenging the ordinance.
A date on hearing in the case is yet to be decided.